Interview prep · Valuation
Valuation interview questions
Valuation questions test whether you can do what bankers are actually paid to do: put a defensible number on a company and argue for it. The raw material is the methodology toolkit — trading comparables, precedent transactions, and the DCF — but the real test is judgment about when each applies and why they disagree.
Interviewers usually open by asking you to name and describe the main methodologies. From there, the questions become comparative: which typically produces the highest value and why, what a control premium is, how you would pick a comparable set for a specific company, and the advantages and limitations of each approach. Superday questions force you to defend choices — why one multiple over another for a given industry, what to do when there are no good comps, why two similar companies trade at different multiples, and how you would present a range rather than a single answer.
The candidates who stand out treat multiples as compressed assumptions about growth, margins, and risk rather than as market trivia. If you can explain why a multiple is high or low in those terms, you can handle nearly any follow-up in this category without having memorized it.
Free sample questions, answered
What are the main valuation methodologies?+
Three core approaches
- comparable companies (trading comps) - current multiples of similar public firms
- precedent transactions - multiples paid in past M&A deals
- discounted cash flow (DCF) - intrinsic value of projected cash flows. Others include LBO analysis (a floor for a financial buyer) and sum-of-the-parts. ⚠ Common wrong answer: "Asset-based, income-based, and market-based valuation." Why it fails: That is the accounting-textbook taxonomy, not the banker's toolkit — the interviewer wants trading comps, precedent transactions, and the DCF, because those distinctions (minority vs. control prices, market vs. intrinsic) are what the job actually turns on.
Why might trading comps and precedent transaction comps give different values?+
Precedent transactions usually price higher because they include a control premium (paying for 100% ownership) and potential synergies, and they reflect market conditions at the time of each deal. Trading comps reflect minority, public-market prices today. Precedents are also harder to compare due to varying deal dynamics and dated data.
⚠ Common wrong answer: "Trading comps are usually higher because they reflect current prices, while old deals are stale." Why it fails: The systematic gap runs the other way: deal prices embed a CONTROL premium and synergy value, so precedents typically print above trading comps. Staleness adds noise in both directions; it does not set the ordering.
Valuation: what candidates ask
Do I need to know current trading multiples for my interview?+
You are unlikely to be graded on quoting precise, up-to-the-minute multiples, and any specific figure goes stale quickly. What interviewers tend to reward is knowing the relationships — why one sector or company deserves a higher multiple than another and what drives the difference. Rough, clearly-hedged context is fine; confident stale numbers are worse than none.
Which valuation methodology do interviewers ask about most?+
The DCF walkthrough is the most predictable single prompt, but comps-based questions — picking a peer set, explaining why precedent transactions usually come in higher, defending a multiple — collectively show up just as much. Prepare all three core methodologies as one connected toolkit rather than ranking them by expected frequency.
How deep do valuation questions go for internship versus full-time interviews?+
The concepts are the same; the expected depth differs. Intern candidates are typically tested on the methodologies, their ordering, and clean definitions, while full-time and lateral candidates face more judgment questions — defending a comp set, handling businesses where standard methods break down. Either way, reasoning about why methods disagree is what earns marks.
Every Valuation question in the bank
All 117 published questions from Valuation: Comps & Precedents — each links to its own page. Free ones show the full model answer.
19
- What are the main valuation methodologies?free
- Why is EV/EBITDA often preferred over P/E for comparing companies?
- What are the three primary valuation methodologies a banker uses, and in one line each, what is each based on?
- What is a 'football field' chart and why do bankers present valuation that way?
- What is trading comps (comparable company analysis) and what core assumption underpins it?
- Why do we use a SET of comparable companies rather than just one or two?
- Which multiples are most commonly used in trading comps and why?
- In the comps output, what does 'the spread' refer to, and which summary statistics do you report?
- What is precedent transactions analysis and what is the core idea behind it?
- Why do precedent transaction multiples usually exceed comparable company (trading) multiples?
- What is tangible book value, and why do bank investors often prefer P/TBV to plain P/B?
- What is a discount for lack of marketability (DLOM), and when do you apply it?
- What is ARR, and why do software investors use EV/ARR as a valuation multiple?
- What is a 'pure-play' comparable, and why do bankers prefer pure-plays in a comp set?
- Quick mental math: peers trade at a median P/E of 15x. Your target has net income of $80m and 100m diluted shares. What is the implied share price?
- What is 'mid-cycle' or normalized EBITDA, and why do you need it when running comps on a cyclical company?
- Should you weight the companies in your comp set by market cap when computing the summary multiple?
- On a football field, are the 52-week trading range and analyst price targets valuation methodologies?
- What is an 'implied multiple,' and how do bankers use DCF-implied multiples as a sanity check?
60
- Why might trading comps and precedent transaction comps give different values?free
- Which of the standard valuation methodologies tend to produce the HIGHEST and the LOWEST values, and why?
- Walk me through how you perform a comparable companies analysis.
- Walk me through a precedent transactions analysis.
- What are the main pros and cons of comparable companies analysis?
- What are the main pros and cons of precedent transactions analysis?
- What are the main pros and cons of a DCF?
- Why is the DCF considered the most 'theoretically correct' method, yet bankers often trust it least in practice?
- When would you rely MORE on a DCF versus on comps and precedents?
- What is an LBO analysis as a valuation method, and why does it typically set a 'floor' value?
- Why do precedent transaction multiples usually exceed comparable company multiples for the same business?
- For comps, why do you generally prefer EV-based multiples (like EV/EBITDA) over equity-based multiples (like P/E) when comparing companies with different leverage?
- How do you select comparable companies, and why does the peer set matter so much?
- How do you select precedent transactions, and how does selection differ from picking trading comps?
- Why are precedent transactions said to be 'stale' or 'point-in-time,' and how does that affect how you use them?
- Beyond the big three, name two more specialized valuation methodologies and when you'd use them.
- If you could only use ONE valuation methodology, which would you pick and how would you justify it?
- What is a control premium and a minority discount, and how do they relate the comps and precedents methods to each other?
- Why don't all three core methodologies converge on the same value, and is that a problem?
- Walk me through the steps to build a trading comps analysis.
- What criteria do you use to select the comparable set?
- An interviewer asks: 'How would you find comparable companies if you've never heard of the target's industry?' Where do you look?
- How many companies should be in a good comp set, and what's the trade-off?
- Why must the numerator and denominator of a valuation multiple be consistent (enterprise vs. equity)?
- Why is EV/EBITDA generally preferred over P/E for comparing companies?
- Should trading comps use trailing (LTM) or forward multiples? Why does it matter?
- When calculating EV for a comp, which share price and share count do you use?
- Why do you typically use the median rather than the mean of the comp set's multiples?
- Higher growth, higher margins, and lower risk - how does each move a company's multiple, all else equal?
- Why can a multiple be 'NM' (not meaningful), and what do you do with those comps?
- How do you treat outliers in the comp set when computing and interpreting the spread?
- How does trading comps differ from precedent transactions, and why do precedents usually show higher multiples?
- Does the public-market trading multiple include a control premium? What does that imply for using comps to value an acquisition?
- What are the main limitations or weaknesses of trading comps an interviewer wants you to acknowledge?
- An interviewer says your comps and your DCF should be presented together. How would you lay out the valuation conclusion using the spread?
- Quick mental math: a target has $50m of EBITDA. Comps trade at a median of 10x with a 25th-75th range of 8x-12x. The target is net cash $30m. What's the implied equity value range?
- Walk me through the steps to build a precedent transactions analysis.
- What are the main screening criteria for selecting precedent transactions, and how do they differ from selecting trading comps?
- How recent should precedent transactions be, and why does the time window matter so much?
- What is a control premium and how is it typically measured?
- Why do you use the 'unaffected' share price rather than the last-traded price when computing a control premium?
- Conceptually, where does a control premium 'come from' — what justifies paying it?
- Which financial period (LTM, calendar year, forward) do you use for the metrics in precedent transactions, and as of what date?
- How do you calculate the Transaction Enterprise Value for a precedent deal?
- How does buyer type — strategic vs financial sponsor — affect the multiple paid in a precedent transaction?
- What is the conglomerate discount, and what causes it?
- It's April 1, 2026. A comp has a December fiscal year-end, with consensus EBITDA of $200m for FY2026 and $240m for FY2027. Build its NTM EBITDA.
- When would you value a company on EV per subscriber, and what are the pitfalls of per-unit multiples?
- What is EV/EBITDAX, and what comparability problem does it solve for oil & gas companies?
- One of your best 'comps' is a diversified company that gets only about 40% of its revenue from your target's business. How do you handle it?
- Your domestic comp set is thin, so you add foreign and emerging-market peers. What adjustments and pitfalls should you consider?
- A company in your comp set IPO'd three months ago. Why might you exclude or flag it?
- Your precedent transactions range comes out BELOW your trading comps range. What could explain it, and what do you do?
- Company A trades at 10x EV/EBITDA growing EBITDA at 25%; Company B trades at 7x growing at 5%. Which is cheaper on a growth-adjusted basis?
- What is the Rule of 40, and how does it connect to SaaS valuation multiples?
- How do you actually construct normalized (mid-cycle) earnings for a cyclical company in a comps analysis?
- You apply the peer median NTM EV/EBITDA multiple to your target's LTM EBITDA. What's wrong, and which direction is the error?
- Your target has negative EBITDA. How does your approach differ if it's a cyclical at the trough versus a structurally unprofitable growth company?
- Explain the 'levels of value' framework: control value, marketable minority, and non-marketable minority.
- When are free-cash-flow multiples (P/FCF or FCF yield) more informative than EV/EBITDA, and what are their pitfalls?
38
- Your DCF gives a value far above the comps and precedents ranges. What do you do and what does that tell you?
- When is P/E (an equity multiple) actually the right multiple to use, despite the leverage problem?
- Name two situations where EV/EBITDA breaks down and you'd use EV/Revenue (or another multiple) instead.
- Why might you use EV/EBIT instead of EV/EBITDA?
- A multiple is just a shorthand for a DCF. Explain what drives a company's EV/EBITDA multiple.
- For comps and precedents, do you use LTM, current-year, or forward metrics - and why does it matter?
- When you spread a calendarization or stub-period adjustment for comps, what problem are you solving?
- Why must the numerator and denominator of any multiple be 'consistent,' and give an example of an inconsistent multiple.
- When would a sum-of-the-parts valuation give a materially different answer than valuing the company as a whole?
- How does the valuation approach change when you're valuing a private company versus a public one?
- Are synergies reflected in comps, precedents, or DCF - and what's the trap?
- An interviewer asks: 'How would you value a company that has negative EBITDA, no profits, and no close public comparables?' Walk through your approach.
- When you spread comps, why do you 'calendarize' the financials, and how?
- What adjustments do you make to a company's metrics before calculating its multiples ('cleaning the numbers')?
- Should stock-based compensation be added back to EBITDA in comps?
- A comp set has a very wide spread in EV/EBITDA (say 6x to 22x). How do you interpret that and what do you do?
- How do you decide which multiple within the spread to apply to your target (median, low end, high end)?
- Two peers are nearly identical operationally but one trades at 12x EV/EBITDA and the other at 8x. What could explain the gap?
- What's the relationship between EV/EBITDA and EBITDA margin or growth - and how can you use it to read the spread?
- You have EV/EBITDA, EV/Revenue, and P/E for the set and they imply different valuations. How do you reconcile them?
- A target's implied EV/EBITDA from comps is 9x but its DCF implies ~13x. How do you think about that discrepancy?
- How does company size affect the multiple, and how should that shape your comp selection (size/liquidity discount)?
- Your target is a high-growth software company with negative EBITDA. How do you run comps?
- A precedent transaction closed in a frothy M&A market two years ago at 14x EBITDA, but markets have since corrected sharply. How do you treat it in your analysis?
- Is a control premium calculated on equity value or enterprise value? Explain.
- When computing the equity purchase price for a precedent deal, why use the offer price in the treasury stock method rather than the current market price?
- Should announced synergies be included in or excluded from a precedent transaction multiple? Why does it matter?
- How does deal consideration — all-cash vs all-stock vs mixed — influence how you read a precedent multiple?
- What is the difference between a fixed exchange ratio and a floating exchange ratio in a stock deal, and why does it matter for precedent analysis?
- You decide to use EV/EBITDAR for a lease-heavy retailer. What must you do to the numerator to keep the multiple consistent?
- What determines whether a bank trades above or below tangible book value, and how do bankers formalize this in comps?
- Walk through a simple sum-of-the-parts valuation with numbers: Segment A has $200m EBITDA (industrial peers at 8x), Segment B has $100m EBITDA (software peers at 12x), unallocated corporate costs are -$50m, and net debt is $350m.
- What are the most common mistakes in a sum-of-the-parts analysis?
- How is the size of a discount for lack of marketability actually estimated, and what factors drive it?
- A comp has a large unfunded pension deficit. How does it affect the EV/EBITDA you calculate, and what consistency trap should you avoid?
- Two comps both trade at 8x EV/EBITDA (EV $800m, EBITDA $100m each). Company A spends $10m a year on capex, Company B spends $60m. Are they equally cheap?
- Your football field's bars barely overlap: comps imply $40-50 per share, precedents $60-70, and the DCF $75-90. How do you get to a recommendation?
- Your target is a pure-play, but every good comparable business is buried inside larger diversified companies. How do you build a defensible comps analysis?
Take the Top 50 questions with you.
The 50 most-asked IB interview questions with worked model answers — one email, free, no mailing list.
Free tier: 20 cards + 10 daily reps + ALL drills — no credit card required.